2026Regular Season
Career Splits
| Challenge Stats | Batter Decision Quality | Call Context | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | TM | Won | Att | Win% | CDQ | Net RE | Net WPA | xChall | COE | bCDQ | bCDQ/P | CS | CC | BC | MO | Call LI | cBE% | acBE% | xChall% |
| 2026 | MIN | 4 | 9 | 44.4% | -0.37 | +0.542 | +0.072 | 4.68 | +4.32 | -0.37 | -0.0032 | 115 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 1.78 | 49.8% | 18.1% | 18.1% |
| Career | 4 | 9 | 44.4% | -0.37 | +0.542 | +0.072 | 4.68 | +4.32 | -0.37 | -0.0032 | 115 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 1.78 | 49.8% | 18.1% | 18.1% | |
2026 Challenges
Result
Role
Window
9 of 9 challenges
| Date▼ | Opp | Role | Inn | Count | Outs | Runners | Ch. Rem. | LI | Net RE | Net WPA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT | May 8 | CLE | batter | ▲ 8 | 3-0 | 0 | 2 | 2.87 | +0.243 | +4.4% | |
| OT | Apr 29 | SEA | batter | ▼ 6 | 0-2 | 1 | 2 | 1.52 | +0.249 | +2.3% | |
| UH | Apr 21 | NYM | batter | ▲ 9 | 0-0 | 0 | 1 | 1.29 | -0.022 | -0.2% | |
| OT | Apr 19 | CIN | batter | ▼ 2 | 0-2 | 0 | 2 | 0.93 | +0.168 | +1.4% | |
| UH | Apr 18 | CIN | batter | ▼ 9 | 1-1 | 1 | 1 | 1.96 | -0.008 | -0.1% | |
| UH | Apr 17 | CIN | batter | ▼ 3 | 2-2 | 2 | 2 | 6.59 | -0.033 | -0.3% | |
| UH | Apr 13 | BOS | batter | ▼ 5 | 3-2 | 1 | 2 | 0.03 | -0.019 | -0.0% | |
| UH | Apr 4 | TB | batter | ▼ 3 | 1-1 | 1 | 1 | 0.49 | -0.105 | -0.7% | |
| OT | Apr 1 | KC | batter | ▲ 6 | 0-0 | 0 | 1 | 0.31 | +0.069 | +0.5% |
Strike Zone (Catcher's View)
Batter
9 pitches
0.1% larger than league avg by area
By Count
cell = win% · won/att · ΔRE
strikes →balls ↓
0
1
2
0
0-050%
1/2+0.05
0-1—
0-2100%
2/2+0.42
1
1-0—
1-10%
0/2-0.11
1-2—
2
2-0—
2-1—
2-20%
0/1-0.03
3
3-0100%
1/1+0.24
3-1—
3-20%
0/1-0.02
By Leverage
Low (<1)
50% (2/4)win
12% (2/17)chall
Med (1–2)
33% (1/3)win
17% (1/6)chall
High (2+)
50% (1/2)win
50% (1/2)chall
Vertical tick = league avg win%. Bar = Luke Keaschall's win%. Challenge% = correct challenges / winnable opportunities.